Home

FVRD Study finds
Propane Cannons to be Ineffective


Home News &
Letters
Cannon
Guidelines
What's the
Problem?
Alternatives
& Solutions
Impacts
of Noise
Who To
Complain To
Noise
Links


In the summer of 2008 the Fraser Valley Regional District initiated an independent study of the effectiveness of various bird scrare devices. The study was jointly funded by the FVRD and BC Ministry of Agriculture, and was carried out by independent researchers from Trinity Western University.

The study forcused on two noise devices, a propane cannon and a Bird Gard audible distress caller, and one visual device, a hawk kite which soars through the air on a long tether when propelled by a slight breeze.

The conclusions of the study were that the propane cannon and hawk kite initially reduced starling populations, but the birds soon returned. After 15 days or about two weeks the cannon became ineffective. The hawk kite was somewhat more effective. The Bird Gard was ineffective almost immediately.

A few interesting statements were made in the study report as follows:

  • Statistical analysis revealed that the propane cannon showed decreases in starling population numbers initially, but starlings slowly returned to higher numbers after the initial introduction of this deterrent. (Once the birds got used to the noise, the cannon acted more like a dinner bell.)

  • auditory devices increase the potential for and incidence of conflicts with neighbours. (No Kidding!)

  • The propane cannon showed an effect on starling numbers at the site tested, with peak effect occurring within the first 15 days after introduction of the deterrent. Though starling numbers remained lower than background control numbers, they did begin to climb again after 15 days, showing no significant difference from the control after the peak effectiveness. (Basically the cannon worked for 2 weeks.)

  • In our study the relatively infrequent use of the cannon (firing frequency of no more than 3 times/hour) may have increased the length of its effective period. (So why do our guidelines allow cannons to fire every 5 minutes?)

  • The following activities and devices were rated as effective in deterring starlings:
    Habitat modification to encourage natural predators such as birds of prey,
    Falconry,
    Active shooting of pest birds,
    Habitat modification to discourage pest birds,
    Netting, when feasible


The full text of the study is about a 20 page document and can be read in its entirety
by clicking on the following link:       FVRD Study